Solutions to Math 2020 homework
Solutions to Math 2020 homework 2
To fit on the paper better, I’ll start with 4 first:
4. find a proof by contradiction for the statement “ is irrational”,
using the following steps:
o. Aiming for a contradiction, assume x is rational . (The opposite (or negation)
of what we want to prove.)
i. Use the definition: What does it mean for x to be rational?
ii. Use the definition: What does it mean for
?
iii. Put i and ii together, and use some properties of logatithms, e.g.,
, so that from the equality
you get another equality, involving only integers, and using
notation introduced in steps i and ii .
iv. Use a previous result , in this case, apply unique prime factorisation.
v. Derive a contradiction. This means that step o was wrong, so x is irrational.
QED
Proof that is irrational: Suppose that x was rational. Then for some integers a, b, we have x = a/b. By definition, if , then 10x = 5. Note that since 5 is greater than 1, this means x must be positive, so a and b can also be taken to be positive. Substituting x = a/b into 10x = 5 gives , now take b powers of both sides, to get so , where a and b are positive integers . But is even, and 5b is odd, so we have an odd number equal to an even number, which is impossible. So the original assumption that x is irrational must have been wrong. So x must be irrational. QED |
As discussed in the class before the homework is due, it’s
useful to do question 3 before question 1:
3. For any positive integer m, the polynomial (x − 1) divides x m − 1. What is
the quotient?
First, note that (x − 1) does divide the
polynomial f (x) = xm − 1. This follows from the result that says that (x − a) is a factor of . So, this means we can make the division, with no remainder. What we get is: or in other words, There are several ways to show this; we can use
long division of polynomials (which you should be able to do), or proof
|
As discussed in class, there is another useful factorisation to know, closely related to the above:
If m is odd, then
or in other words, This can be proved by a similar direct caclulation
as above, or else by substituting x = −t in the previous formula, |
1. Find the prime factorisations of
Several factors can be found by applying the
formulas above :
apply formula with m = 3 You now need to check that 331 is prime, e.g., by
checking that it is not divisible by any prime up to
apply formula
with m = 2 Note, here we had to factor 4033 by hand, by trial
and error — just try all the primes up to it’s square root . Then Other examples work similarly; the final solutions will be: You’ll have to check that 4561 is prime by checking whether it’s divisible by primes up to . |
2. Find four prime divisors of 34110 − 1.
Using the same formulas as above, you can show
this is divisble by 34 − 1 = 33 = 3 × 11 and 34 + 1 = 35 = 5 × 7 — see example in lecture notes. So four factors are 3, 5, 7, 11.
It’s actually quite hard to get much further than
this. You can factor x110 − 1 further; you’ll get the following These correspond to taking m = 2, 5, 11 in the
formulas, so this should not be too hard for you to find these factors. |
Prev | Next |