# Optimization

**Example 5.** Use the formula
to find the x- coordinate of the

vertex of the parabola represented by the quadratic function in **Example 2.**

In **Example 2**, the quadratic function was represented by
the equation

f(x) = 2x^{2} + 12x + 12.

In vertex form

f(x) = 2(x + 3)^{2} − 6,

the coordinates of the vertex were easily seen to be
(−3,−6) (see Figure 2). Let’s see

what the new formula for the x -coordinate of the vertex reveals.

As usual, compare f (x) = 2x^{2} + 12x + 12 with f(x) = ax^{2}
+ bx + c and note that

a = 2, b = 12 and c = 12. Thus, the x-coordinate of the vertex is given by

Note that this agrees with the previous result (see Figure
2). We could find the

y-coordinate of the vertex with

but we find this formula for the y-coordinate of the
vertex a bit hard to memorize.

We find it easier to do the following. Since we know the x-coordinate of the
vertex is

x = −3, we can find the y-coordinate of the vertex by simply substituting x = −3
in

the equation of the parabola . That is, with f(x) = 2x^{2} + 12x − 12,

f(−3) = 2(−3)^{2} + 12(−3) + 12 = −6.

Let’s highlight this last technique.

Finding the y-coordinate of the Vertex. Given the parabola
represented by

the quadratic function

f(x) = ax^{2} + bx + c,

we’ve seen that the x-coordinate of the vertex is given by
x = −b/(2a). To find

the y-coordinate of the vertex, it is probably easiest to evaluate the function
at

x = −b/(2a). That is, the y-coordinate of the vertex is given by

Let’s look at another example.

** Example 6**. Consider the parabola having equation

f(x) = −2x^{2} + 3x − 8.

Find the coordinates of the vertex.

First, use the new formula to find the x-coordinate of the vertex.

Next, substitute x = 3/4 to find the corresponding y-coordinate.

Thus, the coordinates of the vertex are (3/4,−55/8).

**Applications**

We’re now in a position to do some applications of
optimization. Let’s start with an

easy example.

**Example 7**. Find two real numbers x and y that sum to 50
and that have a

product that is a maximum .

Before we apply the theory of the previous examples, let’s
just play with the numbers

a bit to get a feel for what we are being asked to do. We need to find two
numbers that

sum to 50, so let’s start with x = 5 and y = 45. Clearly, the sum of these two
numbers

is 50. On the other hand, their product is xy = (5)(45) = 225. Let’s place this
result

in a table.

For a second guess, select x = 10 and y = 40. The sum of
these two numbers is 50

and their product is xy = 400. For a third guess, select x = 20 and y = 30. The
sum

of these two numbers is 50 and their product is xy = 600. Let’s add these
results to

our table.

Thus far, the best pair is x = 20 and y = 30, because
their product is the maximum

in the table above. But is there another pair with a larger product? Remember
our

goal is to find a pair with a product that is a maximum. That is, our pair must
have a

product larger than any other pair. Can you find a pair that has a product
larger than

600?

Now that we have a feel for what we are being asked to do
(find two numbers that

sum to 50 and that have a product that is a maximum), let’s try an approach that
is

more abstract than the “guess and check” approach of our tables. Our first
constraint is

the fact that the sum of the numbers x and y must be 50. We can model this
constraint

with the equation

x + y = 50. (8)

We’re being asked to maximize the product. Thus, you want
to find a formula for the

product. Let’s let P represent the product of x and y and write

P = xy. (9)

Note that P is a function of two variables x and y.
However, all of our functions in

this course have thus far been a function of a single variable. So, how can we
get rid

of one of the variables? Simple, first solve equation (8) for y.

x + y = 50

y = 50 − x (10)

Now, substitute equation (10) into the product in equation (9).

P = x(50 − x),

or, equivalently ,

P = −x^{2} + 50x. (11)

Note that P is now a function of a single variable x. Note
further that the function

defined by equation (11) is quadratic. If we compare P = −x^{2}+50x with the
general

form P = ax^{2} + bx + c, note that a = −1 and b = 50 (we have no need of the fact
that

c = 0). Therefore, if we plot P versus x, the graph is a parabola that opens
downward

(see Figure 3) and the maximum value of P will occur at the vertex. The
x-coordinate

of the vertex is found with

Figure 3. The maximum product

P=625 occurs at the vertex of the

parabola, (25, 625).

Thus, our first number is x = 25. We can find the second
number y by substituting

x = 25 in equation (10).

y = 50 − x = 50 − 25 = 25.

Note that the sum of x and y is x+y = 25+25 = 50. There
are two ways that we can

find their product. Since we now know the numbers x and y, we can multiply to
find

P = xy = (25)(25) = 625. Alternatively, we could substitute x = 25 in equation
(11)

to get

P = −x^{2} + 50x = −(25)^{2} + 50(25) = −625 + 1250 = 625.

When you compare this result with our experimental tables,
things come together.

We’ve found two numbers x and y that sum to 50 with a product that is a maximum.

No other numbers that sum to 50 have a larger product.

Our little formula has
proven to be a powerful ally . Let’s try

another example.

Prev | Next |