# Reducing Rational Functions

** Sign Changes **

It is not uncommon that you will have to manipulate the signs in a fraction in
order to

obtain common factors that can be then cancelled . Consider, for example, the
rational

expression

One possible approach is to factor −1 out of the numerator to obtain

You can now cancel common factors.

This result is valid for all values of x , provided x ≠ 3.

Let’s look at another example.

**Example 20**. Reduce the rational
expression

to lowest terms . State all restrictions.

In the numerator, factor out 2x, then complete the factorization using the
difference

of two squares pattern.

The denominator can be factored by grouping.

Note how the difference of two squares pattern was applied in the last step.

At this point,

Because we have 1 − x in the numerator and x − 1 in the
denominator, we will factor

out a −1 from 1−x, and because the order of factors does not affect their
product, we

will move the −1 out to the front of the numerator.

We can now cancel common factors.

Note that x + 1 is identical to 1 + x and cancels. Thus,

for all values of x, provided x ≠ −1, 1, or −4/3. These
are the restrictions, values of x

that make denominators equal to zero.

**The Sign Change Rule for Fractions**

Let’s look at an alternative approach to the last example. First, let’s share
the precept

that every fraction has three signs, one on the numerator, one on the
denominator, and

a third on the fraction bar. Thus,

has understood signs
.

Let’s state the sign change rule for fractions .

The Sign Change Rule for Fractions. Every
fraction has three signs, one onthe numerator, one on the denominator, and one on the fraction bar. If you don’t see an explicit sign, then a plus sign is understood. If you negate any two of these parts, • numerator and denominator, or • numerator and fraction bar, or • fraction bar and denominator, then the fraction remains unchanged. |

For example, let’s start with −2/3, then do two negations:
numerator and fraction

bar. Then,

or with understood plus signs,
.

This is a familiar result, as negative two divided by a positive three equals a
negative

two-thirds.

On another note, we might decide to negate numerator and denominator. Then

−2/3 becomes

, or with understood plus signs,
.

Again, a familiar result. Certainly, negative two divided by positive three is
the same

as positive two divided by negative three. They both equal minus two-thirds.

So there you have it. Negate any two parts of a fraction and it remains
unchanged.

On the surface, this seems a trivial remark, but it can be put to good use when
reducing

rational expressions. Suppose, for example, that we take the original rational
expression

from **Example 20** and negate the numerator and fraction bar.

Note how we’ve made two sign changes. We’ve negated the
fraction bar, we’ve negated

the numerator (−(2x − 2x^{3}) = 2x^{3} − 2x), and left the denominator alone.
Therefore,

the fraction is unchanged according to our sign change rule.

Now, factor and cancel common factors (we leave the steps for our
readers —they’re

similar to those we took in **Example 20**).

But does this answer match the answer in **equation (22)**? It
does, as can be seen by

making two negations, fraction bar and numerator.

**The Secant Line**

Consider the graph of the function f that we’ve drawn in **Figure 3**. Note that
we’ve

chosen two points on the graph of f, namely (a, f(a)) and (x, f(x)), and we’ve
drawn

a line L through them that mathematicians call the “secant line.”

**Figure 3.** The secant line passes through

(a, f(a)) and (x, f(x)).

The slope of the secant line L is found by dividing the change in y by the
change in x.

This slope provides the average rate of change of the
variable y with respect to

the variable x. Students in calculus use this “average rate of change” to
develop the

notion of “instantaneous rate of change.” However, we’ll leave that task for the
calculus

students and concentrate on the challenge of simplifying the expression ** equation
(23)**

for the average rate of change.

**Example 24.** Given the function f(x) = x^{2}, simplify the expression for the

average rate of change, namely

First, note that f(x) = x^{2} and f(a) = a^{2}, so we can write

We can now use the difference of two squares pattern to
factor the numerator and

cancel common factors.

Thus,

provided, of course, that x ≠ a.

Let’s look at another example.

**Example 25. **Consider the function f(x) = x^{2} − 3x − 5. Simplify

First, f(x) = x^{2}−3x−5 and therefore f(2) = (2)^{2}−3(2)−5 =
−7, so we can write

We can now factor the numerator and cancel common factors.

Thus,

provided, of course, that x ≠ 2.

Prev | Next |